Handling Errors in Synchronous Function Calls in Workato: Best Practices for Reliable Workflows

Introduction

"Automation thrives on seamless and efficient task execution. But what happens when an error disrupts the process?" In Workato, where synchronous function calls are a common pattern, a single error can halt an entire recipe—unless it’s handled effectively.

This article delves into how to manage errors gracefully within synchronous function calls in Workato. By implementing robust error-handling strategies, you can ensure workflow continuity, better reliability, and an improved user experience.

 

What Are Synchronous and Asynchronous Function Calls?

Synchronous Function Calls

• Tasks execute sequentially, with each step waiting for the previous one to complete.
• Ensures predictable workflows and data consistency.
• However, an error in any step can halt the entire recipe unless managed correctly.

 

Asynchronous Function Calls

• Tasks run independently, allowing recipes to continue execution without waiting for the previous step to finish.
• Useful for parallel processing but challenging for identifying the exact step where an error occurred.

 

Why Choose Synchronous Over Asynchronous Calls?

Synchronous calls are ideal when the success of one task is critical for the next. Consider a scenario involving multiple dependent function calls. The linear execution ensures that each step completes correctly before moving to the next.

This approach preserves workflow stability and minimizes disruptions, ensuring continuity even when individual steps encounter problems.

Scenario: Error Handling in Nested Function Calls

In a real-world scenario, a recipe involves 5–6 parent function calls, each with 2–3 nested child calls. When an asynchronous approach was used, failures were difficult to trace, making troubleshooting complex. Switching to a synchronous approach ensured better traceability, but recipe execution stopped whenever an error occurred.

To address this, error-handling mechanisms were introduced:

1. Returning Error Messages: Each function call returns a status (success or error).
2. Error Checkers: Parent recipes include conditions to identify errors and trigger alerts.
3. Workflow Continuity: Despite an error, the parent recipe continues to execute other steps.

Example: Handling Errors in Synchronous Calls

Sequential Function Calls

A recipe updates account details across three platforms:

• Step 1: Update in Salesforce.
• Step 2: Update in Snowflake.
• Step 3: Update in Slack.

 

Strategies for Error Handling in Synchronous Function Calls

Scenario 1: Sequential Function Calls 

Consider a recipe with the following function calls:

1. LF-001  - Update and check an account in Salesforce.
2. LF-002 - Update and check an account in Snowflake.
3. LF-003 - Update and check an account in Slack.

If LF-001 fails, the error is returned to the parent recipe. Instead of halting, the recipe:

• Logs the error.
• Sends an alert to the team.
• Proceeds to LF-002 and beyond, ensuring the workflow continues.

This ensures seamless execution despite errors, maintaining workflow momentum.

 

Scenario 2: Nested Function Calls 

Now, let’s introduce a layer of complexity with nested calls:

• The Parent Recipe (REC-001) updates account details across applications.
• Function Call (LF-001) interacts with Salesforce, which invokes a Child Function Call (LF-01-001) multiple times for different scenarios.

If the child function fails, the error is returned to LF-001. The recipe uses If-Else conditions to check for error messages and:

• Logs the issue at the parent level. 
• Sends a single consolidated alert to the team, reducing notification overload.
• Proceeds with the remaining steps, avoiding unnecessary disruptions.

This approach ensures efficiency by managing errors at the appropriate level and streamlining notifications.

 

 

This approach ensures that the parent recipe does not stop execution upon encountering an error. Instead, it allows for a consolidated error handling mechanism, where a single email is sent to report the failure, rather than sending multiple emails from each recipe.

Key Benefits of Effective Error Handling

• Workflow Continuity: Ensures recipes continue even when errors occur. 
• Consolidated Alerts: Reduces notification overload by summarizing errors in a single alert. 
• Scalability: Makes recipes robust enough to handle complex, nested workflows. 

Conclusion

Synchronous function calls in Workato are powerful tools for ensuring linear and predictable workflows. However, without proper error-handling mechanisms, they can disrupt processes and compromise efficiency.  By implementing structured error management, you can:

• Handle errors gracefully. 
• Alert teams efficiently. 
• Ensure smooth workflow execution. 

This approach not only prevents recipe failures but also strengthens your automation strategy, enabling reliable and scalable solutions. 

Ready to elevate your workflow automation game?

Discover how Twenty20 Systems can empower your business with seamless integrations and robust error-handling strategies. Contact us to learn more and get started!